Video: Jeff Kuhner of the Washington Times: People around the White House and in democratic circles including senior top editors afraid to pursue Obama's Eligibility and records concealment. Kuhner says the Media's abdicating their responsibility to pursue the truth and hold our politicians accountable. Kuhner goes on to say that All know there is something there, saying "where there's smoke, there's fire," and says the Controversy is gaining traction and momentum. This is an excellent interview with Jeff Kuhner.
Via MrTimotheus85; Steve Malzberg Interviews Jeff Kuhner - If The Truth Got Out About Obama There Would Be A Civil War - Source. Video embedded below... Previous reports with Jeff Kuhner here, here, here and here.
Letter: Senator Jon Kyl declines to support Obama's Political Prisoner Lt. Col. Dr. Terry Lakin.
Via Jeff Lichter; SENATOR KYL DECLINES TO SUPPORT LTC TERRY LAKIN
WHICH MEANS LAKIN KEEPS HIS OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION BUT KYL DOES NOT
Attached(embedded below) please find the letter from Senator Kyl following our appearance in his Phoenix office earlier this month in support of LTC Terry Lakin. Sad indeed. Just like the meaningless leave me out of it letters that McCain sends out on the subject.
And, after receiving some encouragement and stated support at the local office of Congressman Trent Franks, nothing official was heard out of his office either. And meanwhile, LTC Lakin began his 6 month prison sentence at Leavenworth just before Christmas -- not because he pled guilty to disobeying orders from his superior, but because he is now Obama's first political prisoner because he asked the question we all ask and cannot get an answer to. Lakin has also been dismissed from the Army and has lost very sizable pension benefits (www.safeguardourconstitution.com) -snip- Contact Senator Kyl here. Senator Jon Kyl Letter Regarding Poltical Prisoner Lt. Col. Dr. Terry Lakin - 12/16/2010
Cards and letters, but no packages, can be sent to Lakin at the following address, and should not mention rank: Terrence Lakin #89996, 830 Sabalu Road, Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027.
Pleasehelp LTC Terry Lakin's family by making a monetary donation to a Trust set up for his family. Go here today and give what you can. He gave all! http://www.TerryLakinActionFund.com
LTC Terry Lakin is in prison for standing up for his oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. -At Source.
Family Representative for Political Prisoner LTC Terry Lakin Speaks Out: Terry accomplished a huge amount; Brought this into the mainstream... -Continued at Source.
The Washington Examiner's Diana West: Lakin has directed our attention to the moral corruption of our most trusted public servants... -More at Source.
Political Prisoner LTC Terry Lakin's supporters flood Army phone lines: Army asks for mercy from clemency callers; need to redirect messages -Details at Source.
Action Alert: Political Prisoner Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Update; How to Send Mail to Terry and Participate in OPERATION FREE TERRY LAKIN -Details at Source.
Eyewitnesses from LTC Lakin's Kangaroo Court-Martial Speakout: Military Court Hears Doubts of Obama’s Eligibility; LTC Terry Lakin Ambushed. -More at Source.
LTC Lakin stood up for us all in his effort to support and defend the Constitution; We must now stand up and support LTC Terry Lakin. -More at Source.
The Only Video Coverage From Political Prisoner LTC Terry Lakin's Kangaroo Court-Martial Trial; Details The Media Will Not Report. -Video at Source.
Dr. Manning Falsely Imprisoned at Fort Meade During LTC Terry Lakin's Trial. Video at Source.
Commander Charles Kerchner's first thoughts on the lynching of Political Prisoner LTC Terry Lakin at his kangaroo court-martial trial. -Statement and more at Source.
New Details From LTC Lakin's Court-Martial The Media Will Not Report; Concern About Obama's Eligibility Throughout the Chain-of-Command -Details at Source.
Obama's Political Prisoner LTC Terry Lakin Sentenced to 6 Months in Prison: MGEN Vallely; Congress Needs to Take Up Some Initiatives. -Details at Source.
Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin Court-Martial Trial Update(s): Shame on the media and shame on the obots... -Details at Source.
Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin Court-Martial Trial Day 2 Update(s): Obama's first political prisoner... -Details at Source.
Countdown to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin's Court-Martial: The Chain of Command; The Military Makes it Clear: A No Brainer. Chain of Command at Source.
CPT Pamela Barnett(Barnett v Obama), CDR Charles Kerchner(Kerchner v Obama) join in solidarity to support LTC Terry Lakin at trial. Continued at Source.
A public statement regarding Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin's upcoming court-martial from Commander Charles Kerchner. Statement at Source.
General Thomas McInerney on Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Court-Martial; There Will Be Congressional Investigations if Lakin Goes to Ft. Leavenworth. Interview at Source.
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Attorney Neal Puckett on All Fired Up: Obama's Eligibility; IF it is a political question, why aren't politicians pursuing it. Interview at Source.
Attorney Neal Puckett: Call the Army Leadership to Task on LTC Lakin's Plight for Answers on Obama's Eligibility; It's a Constitutional Issue. - Interview at Source.
LTC Lakin's Lawyer: Conviction certain; We have to proceed without the documents, evidence and witnesses that have been denied to the defense. Source.
LTC Lakin's Brother on Revolution Radio: LTC Lakin's Had Other Active Duty Military that Want to Sign Onboard; I'll Carry the Flag on this One! Interview at Source.
Wikipedia Scrubs LTC Terry Lakin Article in 71 Minutes; Jerome Corsi and Al Discuss Scrubbing of LTC Lakin Article with Peter Boyles. Interview at Source.
Dr. Corsi on LTC Lakin's Court-Martial & Obama's Usurpation: pResidents that hide documents are taking a big risk; extensive cover-up going on. Interview at Source.
LTC Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin on Court-Martial; He's Taking His Stand and He is Ready to Defend It, Got Obama's First Political Prisoner!? Interview at Source.
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin and World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi on the Peter Boyles Show to Discuss Lt. Col. Lakin. Interview at Source.
An Original Song Dedicated to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin: By Patra; It's Time to Know the Truth. Song at Source.
Interview embedded below. Via Bulldog Live w/Brian Tilton, WTPL Radio; Andy Martin is the first candidate to officially announce he is running for President of the United States as a Republican and did so on Bulldog Live!
Also, the morning of 12/31/10, Andy Martin will be on the Peter Boyles radio show to discuss his 2012 run and Obama's eligibility. Listen live here; http://www.khow.com/main.html [update: Martin with Boyles interview here]
Fox Host Megyn Kelly debates the Abercrombie / Obama Birth Certificate Controversy but forgets to invite any Birthers, Got Fair and Balanced!? -Video at Source.
World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi Slams Hawaii Guv Abercrombie & MSNBC's Chris 'Old School Birther' Matthews; Lays out all the Birthgate facts. -Video at Source.
MSNBC's Chris 'Old School Birther' Matthews joins Abercommie: Why doesn't Obama just release the original long-form birth certificate, Got Liars!? -Video at Source.
Video: Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie offended by Obama citizenship questions; Then use your commie power and free the Obama records! -At Source.
Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie: discrediting anti-Obama 'birthers' is a top priority; Bring it on you Commie Scumbag, Got Citizen Parents!? -At Source.
Flashback; Confirmed: Neil Abercrombie IS a Socialist! DSA'er Abercrommie Running for Governor of Hawaii to Help Protect Obama's Ineligibility!? -Details here.
Check out the 4 different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB(s), and one of them wasn't Bill O'Reilly or Anderson Pooper;
Flashback from the Right Side of Life;Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's.
The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.
Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.
FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.
And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more HERE and HERE.
And this oldie;Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president's online COLBs images released by Obama's campaign and FactCheck.org...
In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.
FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very different in appearance than the campaign released. Source. And much more HERE.
Forgery is nothing new to the Obama campaign, via Debbie Schlussel;Obama’s Selective Service Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions.
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this(last) year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. The full investigative report is HERE.
And via Give us Liberty; EXPLOSIVE...more proof that AKA OBAMA is a fraud and very likely not even an American citizen!... - Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory - A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed. This is a must read HERE.
Bonus;CONFIRMED: Factcheck.org Published Bogus Fact Regarding Obama’s British/Kenyan Citizenship. We can report that it has been conclusively established – the Factcheck.org report contains false information. Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #1: Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship did not expire on Aug 4, 1982. Factcheck.org was absolutely wrong when they reported Obama’s Kenyan citizenship expired on Aug 4, 1982.
Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #2: While Obama’s status as a British citizen may have been short lived, Factcheck.org failed to state that his status as a British subject was not short lived. Research has discovered multiple legal mechanisms which have the potential to establish that Obama is now a full citizen of Kenya as well as the United Kingdom, the European Union, the Commonwealth of Nations and the Republic of Indonesia. Source.
Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President. Source.
Video: So much for Megyn Kelly's teaser saying she was going to have a "fair and balanced" debate on the latest Abercommie/Obama birth certificate controversy. Funny how they never allow any "Birthers" on to give their position!? They just team up against the "Birthers" without allowing any "Birthers" to defend their postition. It is not like they can't find any "Birthers"....
Shoot me an email Meg, I would be happy to give you my side! Contact me here. Contact Meg here; kelly@foxnews.com
Snippet via Mediaite; Megyn Kelly hosted a debate on the issue on America Live and kicked things off by noting that Gov. Abercrombie has said he was in Hawaii at the time of President Obama’s birth and knew the family. Kelly said the governor had taken an issue that was “quieting down” is jumped it right back to the front burner, which guest Dan Gerstein said threatened to irritate both Democrats and Republicans:
GERSTEIN: It drives everyone crazy. On the far right, you have people totally ignoring the facts, it’s a settled case, and they continue to hold on to this conspiracy. And now you have the governor when it was a dead issue-
KELLY: It was quieting. The number of requests for the birth certificate had gone down, it was like even the birthers were quieting down.
GERSTEIN: Mainstream Republicans were saying leave this alone, it just makes us look extreme and vindictive. And now, for no reason–you can understand the emotions behind it–just blows it up again.
The National Review’s Rich Lowry said of the Hawaiian governor, “I don’t think he has any idea what he’s getting into.” -Source.
World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi Slams Hawaii Guv Abercrombie & MSNBC's Chris 'Old School Birther' Matthews; Lays out all the Birthgate facts. -Video at Source.
MSNBC's Chris 'Old School Birther' Matthews joins Abercommie: Why doesn't Obama just release the original long-form birth certificate, Got Liars!? -Video at Source.
Video: Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie offended by Obama citizenship questions; Then use your commie power and free the Obama records! -At Source.
Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie: discrediting anti-Obama 'birthers' is a top priority; Bring it on you Commie Scumbag, Got Citizen Parents!? -At Source.
Flashback; Confirmed: Neil Abercrombie IS a Socialist! DSA'er Abercrommie Running for Governor of Hawaii to Help Protect Obama's Ineligibility!? -Details here.
Check out the 4 different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB(s), and one of them wasn't Bill O'Reilly or Anderson Pooper;
Flashback from the Right Side of Life;Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's.
The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.
Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.
FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.
And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more HERE and HERE.
And this oldie;Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president's online COLBs images released by Obama's campaign and FactCheck.org...
In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.
FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very different in appearance than the campaign released. Source. And much more HERE.
Forgery is nothing new to the Obama campaign, via Debbie Schlussel;Obama’s Selective Service Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions.
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this(last) year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. The full investigative report is HERE.
And via Give us Liberty; EXPLOSIVE...more proof that AKA OBAMA is a fraud and very likely not even an American citizen!... - Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory - A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed. This is a must read HERE.
Bonus;CONFIRMED: Factcheck.org Published Bogus Fact Regarding Obama’s British/Kenyan Citizenship. We can report that it has been conclusively established – the Factcheck.org report contains false information. Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #1: Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship did not expire on Aug 4, 1982. Factcheck.org was absolutely wrong when they reported Obama’s Kenyan citizenship expired on Aug 4, 1982.
Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #2: While Obama’s status as a British citizen may have been short lived, Factcheck.org failed to state that his status as a British subject was not short lived. Research has discovered multiple legal mechanisms which have the potential to establish that Obama is now a full citizen of Kenya as well as the United Kingdom, the European Union, the Commonwealth of Nations and the Republic of Indonesia. Source.
Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President. Source.
Video: During a December 10, 2010 appearance on Roe & Roeper's Miracle on Indianapolis Blvd. Holiday Extravaganza broadcast, live from The Venue inside the Horseshoe Casino, which benefitted the USO, GEICO's R. Lee Ermey appearing on behalf of Toys 4 Tots took an opportunity to unload on pResident Obama, claiming his administration was destroying the country so that it could impose socialism. Source. Hat tip to the Impeach Obama Campaign.
[update hereandhere] This is an update to the Colonel Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, et al, lawsuit that was in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Supreme Court of the United States website now shows the Petition for Writ of Certiorari was Distributed for Conference of January 14, 2011. The two previous filings by Col. Hollister in the Appeals court embedded below. That makes three eligibility cases against Obama before the Supreme Court in 2010, more details on the other cases here and here.
Cycle of Discernment at Free Republic laid out the expensive details;
(Robert Bauer-married to former Obama WH Communications Director Anita Dunn, who professed that Mao Tse-Tung was a personal hero--was appointed last year as White Counsel by Obama and had been the lead atty representing Obama in blocking release of any Obama documents).
The following information was compiled from the official Federal Elections Commission website for disbursements from the Obama campaign to Robert Bauer's law firm of Perkins Coie, which represents Obama in various eligibility suits.
-Click to Enlarge-
The FEC links follow the entries.
2nd Quarter, 2010, FEC report for Obama for America Perkins Coie: $248483.94
query.nictusa.com...
1st Quarter, 2010
Perkins Coie: $261,206.69
query.nictusa.com...
October 2009 quarterly: Perkins Coie: $314,018.06 query.nictusa.com...
July 2009 quarterly: Perkins Coie: $270,754.18 query.nictusa.com...
April quarterly Perkins Coie: $688,316.42 query.nictusa.com...
Robert Bauer's law firm of Perkins Coie has blocked all information from being released.
Bauer has done his best to prevent the American public from seeing a wide range of Obama's records that could prove, or disprove, his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the Constitution's requirement that the president be a "natural born" citizen. ...Source. -snip-
UPDATE 1: Citizen Wells compiled his up to date research on the Obama FEC filings here.
I wonder why the current Perkins Coie attorney Marc Elias doesn't have this high-profile case added to his bio; http://www.perkinscoie.com/melias
UPDATE 2: QUESTIONS PRESENTED IN PETITION
1. Did the district court follow the rule that a complaint should not be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief?"
2. Did the District Court examine the complaint of the plaintiff/petitioner Hollister as required by the decisions of this and every other federal court to see if it alleged facts to support its claims?
3. Did the district court examine the words "or being under any obligation written or unwritten in the amount of $500 or more..." as set out disjunctively at the end of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1335(a) as they pertain to the plaintiff/petitioner Hollister as a member of the Individual Ready Reserve?
4. Did the district court violate the clear language standard for statutory interpretation?
5. Did the district court, as affirmed by the appellate court, examine and apply the de facto officer doctrine as applied?
6. Did the district court, as affirmed by the appellate court ignore the Nuremburg principle IV as amplified by the Statute of Rome and improperly fail to analyze the ability of the defendant Obama to give a lawful order under that principal under the allegations of the complaint?
7. By refusing to consider the issue of the defendant Obama not being a “natural born citizen” as set out in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution did the district court violate its obligation to consider the issues raised by the complaint?
i
8. Did the district court, as affirmed by the appellate court, take into account the equitable nature of Interpleader when there is no remedy at law?
9. In failing to consider and ignoring the law set out in 1 through 8 above, and instead relying upon extrajudicial criteria such as an assertion that: “The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two–year–campaign for the presidency,…” combined with an attack on the petitioner plaintiff because he “wants it resolved by a court,” and that one of the counsel involved in signing the pleadings for the petitioner/plaintiff, a well known Pennsylvania Democrat politician and prominent Hillary Clinton supporter in that state during the primaries, who was attacked by the district court as an “agent provocateur” and also with sarcastic attacks on the plaintiff/petitioner Hollister, did the district court not engage in such obvious political bias based upon extrajudicial factors as to render its opinion void?
ii
10. Did the district court seek to deny petitioner Hollister his constitutional right of access to the courts.
11. Did the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit adopt that bias so as to render its affirmation of the district court also void?
12. Did the Court of Appeals, in so adopting the bias of the district court, cite this Court’s opinion in Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994) for the opposite of what it holds in an attempt to rationalize its adoption of the bias?
13. Did the Court of Appeals erroneously apply the case law, including its own, in holding that the petitioner/plaintiff and petitioner/counsel could not invoke 28 U.S.C. § 455 at the appellate level?
14. Did the evident bias engaged in below lead to a decision which ignored the law as set out above and as a result place the respondent/defendant Obama above that law and the rule of law in this country generally and threaten the constitutional basis and very existence of our rule of law?
15. Did the courts below not completely ignore the decisions of this court and the clear language of Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning amendments so as to compound its biased elevation of the defendant Obama above the rule of constitutional law?
iii
6. Did the courts below fail to analyze and apply the Bivens doctrine as part of placing the defendant Obama above the rule of law in destruction of the Constitution as the basis of that rule of law?
17. In so placing the defendant Obama above the rule of law and failing to analyze the claims of the complaint and the facts it alleged, did the court of appeals below err in not considering relevant and take judicial notice of the Hawaiian territorial statutes in effect in 1961 and the other matters which the petitioners Hollister and Hemenway sought judicial notice on?
18. Did the courts below create a constitutional rule of law crisis in this country by refusing to consider the intent of the founders in placing the phrase “natural born citizen” in the Constitution as an eligibility requirement for a person to be President?
19. Did the appellate court seek to prevent the public from noticing the harm it was doing to the constitutional rule of law in this country by refusing to publish its opinion on a matter which addressed the very legitimacy of the nation’s Commander–in–Chief?
20. Did the district court, as affirmed, properly assess a Rule 11 sanction against the petitioner/counsel Hemenway in light of the case law of this Court, particularly in the 19th Century and the relevant discourse evidencing the framers’ intent at the time of the founding?
iv
(b) PARTIES: CORPORATIONS
The parties are: The petitioner Col. Gregory S. Hollister, who was the plaintiff in the district court, the petitioner John D. Hemenway, who was sanctioned in the district court under Rule 11 for bringing suit, and the defendants in their capacities as set out in the caption. There are two defendants: the first is the respondent Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama, who is an interpleader and Bivens defendant and Joseph R. Biden, Jr., who is also an interpleader and Bivens defendant. There are no corporations involved so as to require disclosure. -snip-
UPDATE 3:WND; Eligibility challenger wants Obama Supremes excluded - 'There is perception judicial appointments have been made with expectation of favors' -AtSource.
Previous report here and partially posted below including the previous filings in Hollister v Soetoro...
Via WND:Supremes challenged to put Constitution above Twitter - Case questioning eligibility says facts don't support Obama story - Bob Unruh
The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether the Constitution will trump Twitter on issues of national importance, including the eligibility of a president, which could determine the very future of the American form of government.
The request is being made in a petition for writ of certiori, or a request for the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower appellate court, in a case brought on behalf of Col. Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force officer.
He is among the many who have brought court challenges to Obama's tenure in the Oval Office based on doubts about whether Obama qualifies for the position under the U.S. Constitution's demand that presidents be a "natural born citizen," a qualification not imposed on other many other federal officers.
The pleadings submitted to the court, compiled by longtime attorney John D. Hemenway, cite the incredible importance of the claims that Obama, in fact, failed to qualify for the office.
"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," states the pleading.
"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued.
"Thus, it is not hyperbole to state that the entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue. Moreover, it would indicate that the respondent Obama ran for the office of president knowing that his eligibility was at the very least in question," it continued.
The case made headlines at the district court level because of the ruling from District Judge James Robertson of Washington.
In refusing to hear evidence about whether Obama is eligible, Robertson wrote in his notice dismissing the case, "The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court."
Besides the sarcasm involved, the pleading states, the very evidence pertinent to the dispute at issues was ignored.
The pleading outlines that information, which challenges Obama's claim to eligibility and his campaign's citation of a computer-generated Certification of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii, a document also made available to those not necessarily born in the state, as proof of Obama's eligibility.
It suggests there are "sufficient allegations" that Obama was not born inside the United States, and outlines the law and regulations in force at the time of Obama's birth, in 1961.
"At the time of the birth of the respondent Obama in 1961 as alleged, Congress had … the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952. Under the applicable provision of that act … for the respondent Obama to have been a naturalized citizen of the United States at birth, were he born of one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent, as he has alleged throughout his political career he was, his mother would have had to have been continuously resident in the United States for a period of 10 years preceding the date of his birth and, most importantly, she would have had to have resided continuously for five years preceding his birth in the United State after she had turned 14 years old. Since she was only 18 when Obama was born, this condition was clearly not fulfilled," the arguments said.
It also raised the suggestion that there are sound arguments to the effect that a "natural born citizen" is someone born to two citizen parents, and Obama himself has documented that his father never was a citizen of the U.S.
The fact that the evidence never was reviewed and the judge based a "biased" decision on "a completely extrajudicial factor" [twittering], prevented Hollister from having the constitutional rule of law applied, the petition states. .
"A further example of this bias based on extrajudicial factors by the district court was its observation that a lawyer associated with the initiation of petitioner Hollister's case, a prominent Democrat in Pennsylvania who backed Hillary Clinton in her successful primary there against respondent Obama, though never admitted in the case, was 'probably' the 'real plaintiff' in the case and that he and another lawyer who signed filings but was also never admitted … were 'agents provocateur' whose efforts to raise the issue of the respondent Obama's constitutional eligibility in lawsuits were a crusade in which the petitioner Hollister was a dupe," the petition says.
The questions suggested by the petition are weighty:
"Did the district court examine the complaint, as required by the decisions of this and every other federal court, to see if it alleged facts to support its claims?"
"By refusing to consider the issue of defendant Obama not being a 'natural born citizen' as set out in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution, did the district court violate its obligations to consider the issues raised by the complaint?"
"In … relying on extrajudicial criteria such as an assertion that 'the issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency' combined with an attack on petitioner … did the district court not engage in such obvious political bias and upon extrajudicial factors as to render its opinion void?"
"Did the … bias engaged in lead to a decision which ignored the law as set out above and as a result place the respondent-defendant Obama above that law and the rule of law in this country generally and threaten the constitutional basis and very existence of our rule of law?"
"Did the courts below not completely ignore the decisions of this court and the clear language of Rule 15 of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning amendments so as to compound its biased elevation of the defendant Obama above the rule of constitutional law?"
While the district judge dismissed the case because it had been "twittered," the appeals court simply adopted his reasoning, but wouldn't even allow its opinion affirming the decision to be published, the petition explains.
Attorney Taitz Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court for Captain Rhodes/Taitz v. Colonel MacDonald/Obama, et al... - More details here.
